who knows?///

If we were to start picking up all the breadcrumbs that Ken has left us along the road, we would find ourselves in a territory that needs a great deal of developing. I say that because we would talk and no one would understand us. This is more my fault than my own communities because it appears to me that the supreme reasoning and insight would be seen had I the words of articulation. This is assuming that we follow Ken’s advice; there is no critique without a matching Kosmic Address.

If we continually stand on solid ground, created by our predecessors and accredited through all four quadrants we achieve the balance and harmony that allows us to create the imagery and direction for further development.

Taking into account that our being in the world arises in all four quadrants, body and mind must exist in balance…that means Art, Morals and Science must be seen in their counterpart. This puts a heavy burden on the right hand quadrants because the mind can travel without reason or logic, what reigns it in; is the “WE”.

What does all this say about religion and the precious gift of the Traditions? I would say that it begins to expose the need for Order, with authority given to contemplatives who have followed the directives of the new paradigm. What once seemed like an absurd notion - considering the unchangeable and fortified structure of the churches, now seems like irrelevant obstacles having no inertia or means for hindrance. We are the ones moving and we cannot control those who prefer stagnation, but we must assume that we are laying tracks for others to follow. Something we may not see in our own lifetimes.

“Fear Not” is the phrase most used in the Bible, this assumes we know fear but we act anyway. I can think of many ways in which I would prefer not to act according to my fears, especially since we dare to be proclaiming Spirit’s perspective according to the platform on which we stand.

The Myth has been deconstructed and the new myth is a dynamic energy that continually gets tweaked and tried. The Myth is an effective tool revealing as Ambo stated: Myth apparently speaks to parts of us that aren't trying to be practical or necessarily utilitarian, certainly not scientific. This may be related to human's persistent need for story-telling. It seems also related to the strong emotional charge that is often associated with myths for individuals and groups. Some might say that mythopoetic rendering can evoke spirit more than dry descriptive recounting.

Something I see as a necessary means of articulating contemplation by grounding it with known associations. If nothing else, for now it exposes the relationship between Spirit and Matter and makes it all the more urgent for “WE” to get the innuendos.